High Rankings Question of the Week

February 22, 2012This week I asked my social media followers:

++Do you have a content marketing funnel or plan?++


Here's how they responded:


Twitter


AndyBeal: No, unless you count: Churn it out, when we can. ;-)
Twitter
Pagesauce: Yep, have a content marketing plan ? sticking to it or getting others to isn't quite so easy.


JTPotts: I have a plan, still trying to sell it to execs though. :-(

Labels: ,

Posted on 9:29 PM by Rome | 0 Comments

High Rankings Question of the Week

By Jill Whalen

To go along with this week's article on Rel=Author, I asked my social media followers:

Have you implemented Rel=Author on your content yet? If yes, does it show in Google results?

Here's how they responded:

Twitter

SEOChemist: Yes, yes and no. I have it working on some sites and not others. Yet to figure out what is going wrong.

Realicity: Yes, I've implemented & not showing in search results. Wondering if it's a high school'esque popularity content for Google :(

Marie_Haynes: Yes, I implemented it months ago and it started showing 2 weeks ago.  Seeing dramatic CTR increases!

Google+

Steven Weldler: Not yet.

Tamra Hamblin: Yes and not yet.

David Wallace: Yes about 2 to 3 weeks ago and still has not taken effect. Not sure if I did it correctly but haven't heard anything back from Google so uncertain. I heard it is still a manual process and can take some time.

Gil Reich: Yes, implemented it. No, it doesn't show up.

Sean Carlos: Yes, yes.

Dianna Huff: Not yet but it's on the to-do list.

Ken Horst: Not yet :(

Wissam Dandan: Yes and Yes.

David Sottimano: Yes and No.

Jill's Comment: Judging by these replies, it looks like my article providing 5 reasons why you need to implement Rel=Author ASAP has come out just in time!

Want to participate in the High Rankings Question of the Week?

Follow @JillWhalen on Twitter
Like High Rankings on Facebook
Circle Jill Whalen on Google+

Jill Whalen is the CEO of High Rankings,Jill Whalen an SEO Services company in the Boston, MA area since 1995. Follow her on Twitter @JillWhalen

If you learned from this article, be sure to sign up for the High Rankings Advisor SEO Newsletter so you can be the first to receive similar articles in the future!

Labels: ,

Posted on 5:35 PM by Rome | 0 Comments

High Rankings Question of the Week

By Jill Whalen

To go along with this week's article on Rel=Author, I asked my social media followers:

Have you implemented Rel=Author on your content yet? If yes, does it show in Google results?

Here's how they responded:

Twitter

SEOChemist: Yes, yes and no. I have it working on some sites and not others. Yet to figure out what is going wrong.

Realicity: Yes, I've implemented & not showing in search results. Wondering if it's a high school'esque popularity content for Google :(

Marie_Haynes: Yes, I implemented it months ago and it started showing 2 weeks ago.  Seeing dramatic CTR increases!

Google+

Steven Weldler: Not yet.

Tamra Hamblin: Yes and not yet.

David Wallace: Yes about 2 to 3 weeks ago and still has not taken effect. Not sure if I did it correctly but haven't heard anything back from Google so uncertain. I heard it is still a manual process and can take some time.

Gil Reich: Yes, implemented it. No, it doesn't show up.

Sean Carlos: Yes, yes.

Dianna Huff: Not yet but it's on the to-do list.

Ken Horst: Not yet :(

Wissam Dandan: Yes and Yes.

David Sottimano: Yes and No.

Jill's Comment: Judging by these replies, it looks like my article providing 5 reasons why you need to implement Rel=Author ASAP has come out just in time!

Want to participate in the High Rankings Question of the Week?

Follow @JillWhalen on Twitter
Like High Rankings on Facebook
Circle Jill Whalen on Google+

Jill Whalen is the CEO of High Rankings,Jill Whalen an SEO Services company in the Boston, MA area since 1995. Follow her on Twitter @JillWhalen

If you learned from this article, be sure to sign up for the High Rankings Advisor SEO Newsletter so you can be the first to receive similar articles in the future!

Labels: ,

Posted on 1:43 PM by Rome | 0 Comments

Why Both Weight Loss and Google Rankings Are Limited Goals

October 19, 2011By Jill Whalen

My husband and I were talking the other night about one of his pet peeves: When people start exercising and eating healthier, they usually measure their success by how much weight they've lost (or not) as shown to them by their trusty scale. It annoys him because, Image Credit: Ben Stassenwhile losing weight is one sign that you're doing things right, after a certain point, it can only tell you so much.

It reminded me of my own pet peeve: how people usually measure the success of their SEO work by checking how well their site ranks in the search engines. Yet, similar to weight loss being a poor main goal for your health and fitness regime, where your pages rank for specific keyword phrases is also a poor main goal.

Healthier Body ? Healthier Website

Your principal goal when eating in moderation and exercising regularly should be to become healthier overall, and ultimately to live a longer and more satisfying life. And your chief goal with an SEO program should be to create a better overall website and make more money from it -- which, incidentally, can also make for a more satisfying life! ;)

Writing articles nobody is really interested in about the history of your products is like eating lots of junk food. It's empty calories. There's no value in it to anyone (except perhaps the donut store) and it keeps you from eating the good stuff. Writing keyword-filled content just for the sake of search engines works the same way: It keeps you from adding true value to your website. While you can try to cover your big ole body in a floral mu'umu'u, let's face it, you're still out of shape underneath it all.

And it's the same with your website. There's no sense adding good content on top of bad. If it's already full of junk (food), it's time to trim it down and cut out the crap (content).

So how do you measure the effects of trimming the fat?

I'm not saying that weighing yourself and checking up on your rankings are utterly useless. In the beginning, both can be a good way to make sure you're on the right track. Let's say you get all into your new health kick because none of your clothes fit and you can barely make it up a flight of stairs without having to stop for a rest. The more you exercise and eat right, the better the numbers on your scale are going to look. This can definitely keep you motivated. But the weight loss itself is only one result of your success. Other results might be that you look and feel better. In fact, even if you lost only a few pounds, if you're eating better and exercising regularly, you're likely a whole lot healthier and may even have a lot more energy and overall focus.

And so it is with SEO.

When your rankings for a few key terms move from "nowhere to be found" to being on the first page in Google, it shows you that you're certainly on the right track. But here's what is more important: You're likely seeing not only more visitors to your website, but more targeted visitors. And just as more energy results from a good exercise regimen, more conversions and sales come from more targeted website visitors.

But you can only lose so much weight (and check so many rankings).

If you keep up with your fitness program you'll probably get to a point where -- even though you're back in your skinny jeans -- the needle on the scale has stopped moving in the "right" direction. When you measure your success by how many pounds you're losing, this can be confusing. You know you're exercising often and eating correctly, but can't understand why you're not still losing weight. And this is where my husband's pet peeve comes in.

According to him, the more you exercise, the more muscle mass you put on your body. This in turn may even cause you to gain weight because muscle weighs more than fat. At this point, it's silly to be constantly weighing yourself and worrying why you're not losing weight anymore. So at this point you can change your goals. After all, you are probably looking fabulous with a whole new body shape. You're healthy, fit and trim. Your scale isn't measuring your lost percentage of body fat, nor is it taking into consideration the fact that you're stronger and no longer short of breath. So why keep looking at the scale?

It's the same with your website.

Once you know you're on the right track with your SEO, you no longer need to check your rankings. They simply don't tell the whole story. Rankings don't make you money or make your site convert. They don't show you how healthy (or not) your website is.

After the initial stages of your SEO program, it's time to put away your rank checking software (or scale) and adopt new goals -- start counting how often your phone rings, your contact form gets filled out, and how fabulously your website is converting all those extra targeted search engine visitors. Then sit down and have a healthy fruit smoothie -- because you deserve it!

Jill

del.icio.us Email a FriendPrintRSSPost Comment Related Articles? Related Forum Posts?

Labels: , , , ,

Posted on 2:42 PM by Rome | 0 Comments

High Rankings Question of the Week

By Jill Whalen

This week I asked my social media followers:

++How do you measure the success of your SEO work?++

Twitter

Netmeg: $$ this year vs. $$ last year.

Chiropractic: Phone calls.
Twitter

Realicity: The value of the initial leads & sales generated via search as well as long-term impact from the lifetime customer value.

Marcusbowlerhat: It depends on the campaign & client but ideally, conversions & goals in analytics beat ranking or traffic reports.

JTPotts: Conversions: Forms filled out, driving directions retrieved, documents downloaded, and occasionally coupons redeemed.

yankeerudy: Metrics tied to objectives set before work started i.e., conversion rate, raw organic visits, etc. Definitely not rankings!

oleary: One way to measure the success of SEO work is to look at total number of keywords sending traffic.

anthonydnelson: New customers, conversion rate %, and sales brought in from non-branded organic traffic.

noelx99: More customers/leads/business for my clients.

TomSchmitz: I look at target keyword traffic, all non-$ search (traffic & keyword diversity).

Facebook

Matt Crouch: Depends on the client, their goals and what part of the website I am able to have input in. Is the client looking for traffic, forms filled out, phone calls, orders placed?Facebook At the end of the day I am still looking for traffic. If traffic is increasing and those sources were influenced by my work. Now if I wrote the copy, picked the products to sell, etc., I may hold myself responsible to other goals.

Dianna Huff: Depends ? increased (targeted) traffic, conversions, increased search engine presence for targeted keywords and leads.

Rob Snell: I'm all e-commerce, so revenue, revenue, revenue. We measure top 100 pages by organic traffic/revenue, and then long tail. We also assign revenue per visitor to each keyword, then measure the rank to determine where we should focus efforts, to see if improved rankings would be worth the SEO work or not.

Sarah Theodorou: Improved traffic to the site from engines because of increased search visibility. Improved traffic levels from referral sites where I have improved the presence.
Most importantly, that improved level of traffic from engines and referral sites has converted.

Google+

Jon Henshaw: Increased organic search traffic that results in higher site engagement, goal completions and/or increased ad revenue.

Joe Hall: What Jon Henshaw said. But also it depends on who the work is for. If it's for a client then we work with them on what their key performance indicators (KPI's) are. If it's for us, then it's usually conversions.

Thomas Rosenstand: Easy. When my clients' business goes through the roof thanks to my work. I don't care about their rankings and/or traffic. I care about their revenue. So do they ;-)

Tilak Bisht: I measure organic search traffic with increased revenue and profit.

Jorge Steffen: What stage of what kind of project are we in? Organic growth and goal completions (think sign-ups or subscriptions) could be more important early and transfer conversion optimization might fit better later in a project.

Denis Desnoyers: For me, it's quite simple. When I see a site that I put up for a client winding up on the first page of any search engine and staying there for targeted keywords, my clients are happy and so am I. You can't crunch the pride you get for your work into numbers.

Mark Edmondson: Revenue increase from non-brand keywords.

David Pavlicko: Revenue increase, non-branded search volume, and conversions. Determining goal values for conversion types and applying those to goals within analytics has really helped demonstrate the value of our services and justify our fees.

Scott Van Achte: Totally case by case. Sometimes conversions in the form of sales, leads, sign-ups, etc. Sometimes strictly traffic. Revenue increases. And even sometimes, just the ranking itself, traffic being unimportant (yes, I have had at least one client that only cared about this for a variety of reasons).

Kevin Gallagher: Success is measured by whatever the clients goals are and are not necessary what we would perceive them to be.

And...

Jill's Response: Increased targeted website traffic to the pages they should be landing on, and increased conversions, phone calls, leads and sales.

Want to participate in the High Rankings Question of the Week?

Follow @JillWhalen on Twitter
Like High Rankings on Facebook
Circle Jill Whalen on Google+

Jill Whalen is the CEO of High Rankings,Jill Whalen an SEO Services company in the Boston, MA area since 1995. Follow her on Twitter @JillWhalen

If you learned from this article, be sure to sign up for the High Rankings Advisor SEO Newsletter so you can be the first to receive similar articles in the future!

Labels: ,

Posted on 2:13 AM by Rome | 0 Comments

High Rankings Question of the Week

By Jill Whalen

This week I asked my social media followers:

++How do you measure the success of your SEO work?++

Twitter

Netmeg: $$ this year vs. $$ last year.

Chiropractic: Phone calls.
Twitter

Realicity: The value of the initial leads & sales generated via search as well as long-term impact from the lifetime customer value.

Marcusbowlerhat: It depends on the campaign & client but ideally, conversions & goals in analytics beat ranking or traffic reports.

JTPotts: Conversions: Forms filled out, driving directions retrieved, documents downloaded, and occasionally coupons redeemed.

yankeerudy: Metrics tied to objectives set before work started i.e., conversion rate, raw organic visits, etc. Definitely not rankings!

oleary: One way to measure the success of SEO work is to look at total number of keywords sending traffic.

anthonydnelson: New customers, conversion rate %, and sales brought in from non-branded organic traffic.

noelx99: More customers/leads/business for my clients.

TomSchmitz: I look at target keyword traffic, all non-$ search (traffic & keyword diversity).

Facebook

Matt Crouch: Depends on the client, their goals and what part of the website I am able to have input in. Is the client looking for traffic, forms filled out, phone calls, orders placed?Facebook At the end of the day I am still looking for traffic. If traffic is increasing and those sources were influenced by my work. Now if I wrote the copy, picked the products to sell, etc., I may hold myself responsible to other goals.

Dianna Huff: Depends ? increased (targeted) traffic, conversions, increased search engine presence for targeted keywords and leads.

Rob Snell: I'm all e-commerce, so revenue, revenue, revenue. We measure top 100 pages by organic traffic/revenue, and then long tail. We also assign revenue per visitor to each keyword, then measure the rank to determine where we should focus efforts, to see if improved rankings would be worth the SEO work or not.

Sarah Theodorou: Improved traffic to the site from engines because of increased search visibility. Improved traffic levels from referral sites where I have improved the presence.
Most importantly, that improved level of traffic from engines and referral sites has converted.

Google+

Jon Henshaw: Increased organic search traffic that results in higher site engagement, goal completions and/or increased ad revenue.

Joe Hall: What Jon Henshaw said. But also it depends on who the work is for. If it's for a client then we work with them on what their key performance indicators (KPI's) are. If it's for us, then it's usually conversions.

Thomas Rosenstand: Easy. When my clients' business goes through the roof thanks to my work. I don't care about their rankings and/or traffic. I care about their revenue. So do they ;-)

Tilak Bisht: I measure organic search traffic with increased revenue and profit.

Jorge Steffen: What stage of what kind of project are we in? Organic growth and goal completions (think sign-ups or subscriptions) could be more important early and transfer conversion optimization might fit better later in a project.

Denis Desnoyers: For me, it's quite simple. When I see a site that I put up for a client winding up on the first page of any search engine and staying there for targeted keywords, my clients are happy and so am I. You can't crunch the pride you get for your work into numbers.

Mark Edmondson: Revenue increase from non-brand keywords.

David Pavlicko: Revenue increase, non-branded search volume, and conversions. Determining goal values for conversion types and applying those to goals within analytics has really helped demonstrate the value of our services and justify our fees.

Scott Van Achte: Totally case by case. Sometimes conversions in the form of sales, leads, sign-ups, etc. Sometimes strictly traffic. Revenue increases. And even sometimes, just the ranking itself, traffic being unimportant (yes, I have had at least one client that only cared about this for a variety of reasons).

Kevin Gallagher: Success is measured by whatever the clients goals are and are not necessary what we would perceive them to be.

And...

Jill's Response: Increased targeted website traffic to the pages they should be landing on, and increased conversions, phone calls, leads and sales.

Want to participate in the High Rankings Question of the Week?

Follow @JillWhalen on Twitter
Like High Rankings on Facebook
Circle Jill Whalen on Google+

Jill Whalen is the CEO of High Rankings,Jill Whalen an SEO Services company in the Boston, MA area since 1995. Follow her on Twitter @JillWhalen

If you learned from this article, be sure to sign up for the High Rankings Advisor SEO Newsletter so you can be the first to receive similar articles in the future!

Labels: ,

Posted on 11:43 AM by Rome | 0 Comments

High Rankings Question of the Week

By Jill Whalen

This week I asked my social media followers:

++Do you change URLs for SEO purposes if they're not currently using keywords but are being indexed fine?++

Here's how they responded:

Twitter

Daveminchala: If page has poor or no search traffic or visibility, I'll do it. If it already performs decently well, I'll optimize somewhere else.

Kenjansen: I did do that and my rankings went even higher after 6 to 8 weeks. New high ranking on all 9 pages I changed. 2 weeks of severe pain, though.

Markkennedysem: If the page has lots of links pointing to it or authority, I wouldn't. 301 may not pass all of the link value. If not, I would.

Phixed: I haven't done that for years. Once indexed, linked to and ranking properly, I leave as is whenever possible.

Helenculshaw: No! No need to fix what's not broken, when there are usually much bigger issues to worry about!

Carolinelbell: If there's value for user and/or rankings then maybe. Pros & cons list needed.

Dasnsandy: Yes, I do change 'em.

LesFaber: I would. And would also do a 301-redirect for the Old URL.

Parthasarthi197: If the page is indexed, I would not like to change the URL only to include the keyword in URL.

Webtones: Only if I feel users will increase click through, seeing the keyword as a call to action. Rarely if ever for the bots.

Nilaye10: Turning an indexed URL into a keyword-rich URL should only be done if site technology warrants a complete URL transformation.

Google+

Shawn Warren: I have.

Hershel Miller: Absolutely; getting them reindexed is straightforward enough.

Craig Fifield: On my sites--sure. On a client's site it should be weighed against the technical hurdles. Also, keep the competition in mind--if you are going to outrank everyone anyway, the change might not be worth it.

Dave Winget: I'd say do it provided you know how to 301 correctly. It's only going to help.

Aaron Hassen: Include keywords, yes. Then redirect your old ones.

Larry Chrzan: Usually I don't change URLs if there's no good reason to do so. At the point where I'm doing a website re-design for a client, the question always comes up.

Rajesh Kumar: If we are looking for organic traffic, indexing smoothly, robot friendly and if it's dynamic URL then sure, it helps to change it or make it 301-redirect.

Ash Nallawalla: Absolutely not, unless there is overwhelming evidence that the current format is leading to poor indexing for other pages and Google WMT can't fix those issues. Google is pretty good with ugly URLs these days. If most of the pages have been indexed, I would let sleeping dogs lie. Keywords in URLs are nice to have if you are starting a site, but rarely make a difference to indexing.

Michael Gray: Indexed and not ranking like putting on a sequin evening gown to spend the night alone watching a bravo marathon. If you're indexed and not ranking yeah I'd fix those; indexed and ranking I'd leave as is.

Thomas Rosenstand: Absolutely not. Why would I?

Tim Ronning: As a rule of thumb here I'd say no, but it kinda depends on other factors like if this is part of a bigger project, redesign, refocus, mismatched topical indexing, etc.

Steve Gerencser: It depends. If this is for a large site then no, the ROI usually isn't enough to justify the time/money spent making all the changes and redirects and testing to make sure they are done right. We make the change going forward from that point.

Marcus Miller: Nope, generally not. I manage one site with horrid URLs but the SERPs display the breadcrumb (in place of the URL) so everything looks neat and tidy and there is seemingly no impacts on click through. I would always review on a case by case basis but where budgets are tight I can usually find more productive areas to focus on.

Facebook

Santosh Singh: Definitely not.

Dave Davies: 90% of the time I'd say not. There are exceptions such as a new site that's likely a ways off from ranking.

Steven Musumeche: Yes, I did make the URLs more descriptive and have keywords. With the use of 301 redirects, it worked great.

Karon Price Thackston: Change existing URLs? No. But if I create a new page, I'll include keywords in the URL.

Pontus ?sterlin: Been thinking about this just recently and came to the decision to actually change existing URLs. Even considering adding keyword on start page URL -- mysite.com/keyword instead of mysite.com -- in cases where keyword is a highly competitive one.

Barbara Keek: My first reaction was no. But what's the use to be indexed if they don't contain the right keywords? So yes!

Jill's Comment: Wow, lots of differing opinions with this one! My opinion mirrors Ash Nallawalla's above: Never change URLs unless they're causing a problem.

Labels: ,

Posted on 12:26 PM by Rome | 0 Comments

High Rankings Question of the Week

By Jill Whalen

This week I've changed the name of this newsletter feature from the "Twitter Question of the Week" to the "High Rankings Question of the Week."  I decided that it was too limiting to only ask my Twitter followers because I also have friends on Facebook and now Google+. Moving forward, you'll have the opportunity to respond on any of those social networks. Keep in mind that while you can write more than 140 characters on Facebook and G+, I'd appreciate it if you could continue to keep your answers succinct, and I'll be editing them as necessary!

To go along with today's rant on deceptive marketing, I asked my social media followers:

++Are dishonesty, stretching the truth, or white lies necessary to be a good marketer?++

Here's how they replied at Twitter:

tcpeter: No. You position your product based on its strengths and weaknesses. But long-term value with customer depends on honesty and transparency.

joshgister: No ? unless you are trying to sell something nobody needs ? also known as a con.
Twitter
Casieg: I'd like to think not, but there is the question that, if you omit things, does that count as lying? I don't know.

BrianHarnish: I don't think so. I believe that delivering the right message to the right audience is key. No deception or lies.

analyticscanvas: Honesty and transparency are what a good marketer needs. Anything else is (a) wrong and (b) will get detected in an instant!

ann_donnelly: Dishonesty, even white lies, are not the way to be a good marketer; lost credibility and trust = lost referrals and relationships.

forefront1: Never ? unless your product is weak or flat-out sucks.

joehall: There is a very fine line, and it's also blurry and sometimes hard to see...but also everything is relevant given the right context.

chris_m_mason: IMO good marketing and PR are based on building trust. Dishonesty ruins trust. Lies will catch you out in the long term.

GrpTwentySeven: Even when the truth hurts, it's better to be open, direct and honest. You will gain from it in the long run.

JTPotts: No way! Marketing is all about identifying real needs and showing good solutions. Anything else is ineffective.

Here's how they replied at Facebook:

Derrick Wheeler: They are required to be a good person. There is a time and place for all three ? I prefer stretching the truth, though. Of all three choices, stretching the truth is the most honest, right? So that is my preference. Plain ol' truthfulness can work too!Facebook

Jon Rognerud: Dishonesty, no. Stretching (depending) may be fine to get attention, but you'd better deliver on that promise. As Seth Godin says: "All marketers are liars"... ;-)

Eric Lander: None of them are necessary. All of them are helpful for certain clientele, however.

Larry Mersman: Dishonesty will kill your business quickly. It will lump you into the same category as the old "used car salesman." In this business, news spreads quickly. Stretching the truth seems to be the less offensive of the three, as it is still somewhat based on truth. I'd rather be honest with the customer. They do appreciate it.

Karon Price Thackston: I don't think any of the 3 are necessary.

David Matson: It's only necessary if you are marketing a truly crappy product.

Steven Musumeche: No, just exaggeration. :)

Rob Watts: No, but it IS all about how you tell the story. Paint it wrong or overdo it and it'll look like crap. A good marketer, like a good artist, will know exactly what it is they're trying to communicate and will use their tools and skills to satisfy the recipient.

Woodie Gay: No! Little white lies will lead to bigger lies. Where does it end. They will always come back to bite you. Always tell the truth even if it loses you a sale. Your conscience will tell you that you were right.

Scot Smith: No. Being anything but honest is never acceptable and will always bite you in the rear later on. Even if it doesn't catch up with you, will you be satisfied to have met your campaign goals by being unethical? It's more important to only accept contracts for marketing products and brands that you can fully buy into yourself; once you reach that level you'll undoubtedly reach success in your marketing efforts.

Here's how they replied at Google+:

Tim Laughlin: No, getting caught in those practices is quite often a deal breaker.

Gary Stock: No, they are not necessary; they are regrettable. If political campaigns qualify as "marketing," then sadly, all three are becoming more common ? especially intentional Google+dishonesty. Given many popular claims contrary to economic principles, scientific realities, and even historical facts, such deceptiveness is mounting by the day.

Mike Wilton: To be a good marketer, no. To be a successful salesman, sometimes, but even in those instances you'd better make damn sure that you can make up for it in the end. The biggest thing to consider if you have to be dishonest is the risk. If you get caught, will the person impacted understand why and accept it, or will it create a level of distrust for your or your message?

Dianna Huff: Absolutely not. I hate it when people say, "It's marketing!" as if all advertising / marketing is not honest / truthful.

Jill's comment: Thanks for the very thoughtful replies! While it certainly sounds like you're all wonderful non-deceptive marketers, I do wonder if those who disagree were (rightfully) keeping silent. If you don't quite agree, but would rather not leave your name, feel free to share your comments anonymously below.

Want to participate in the High Rankings Question of the Week?

Labels: ,

Posted on 3:05 AM by Rome | 0 Comments